rubric.txt

Here is an example of a high-quality ASCII art for this task:

```
{reference_ascii}
```

Use this as a reference for quality, detail level, and craftsmanship when evaluating the submission. Below are the coring dimensions (sum → 1.0):

1. Instruction compliance (0.30)  
   0.30: Art wrapped in backticks as requested (```art```); no extra content outside backticks
   0.15: Art present but formatting issues (missing/extra backticks, minor extra text)
   0.00: No backticks, extra commentary, multiple tool calls, or mixed content

2. Requested item match (0.30)  
   0.30: Depicts the requested animal (or item) with unmistakable, item-specific features (e.g., trunk for elephant, long neck for giraffe, beak + wings for bird)  
   0.15: Vaguely animal-like or generic creature; could be the item but weakly indicated  
   0.00: Wrong subject or unrelated shapes

3. Recognizability and silhouette (0.20)  
   0.20: Clear silhouette; core anatomy reads at a glance (in monospaced font)  
   0.10: Recognizable with effort; proportions or anatomy are a bit off  
   0.00: Unrecognizable

4. Craftsmanship and layout (0.10)  
   0.10: Good alignment and spacing; consistent line lengths; no tabs or trailing escape codes; holds shape in monospaced render  
   0.05: Minor alignment issues; still coherent  
   0.00: Misaligned or broken on monospaced display

5. Effort / “best version” signal (0.10)  
   0.10: Shows detail, multi-line effort, and clear attempt at quality  
   0.05: Minimal or simplistic attempt, but functional  
   0.00: Trivial or careless (e.g., one character)

IMPORTANT: Make sure to clearly express your rationale and scoring.