@azaroth42, thanks for providing a more Linked Art friendly representation of the AAT terms, i.e.
https://data.getty.edu/vocab/aat/300404655
I didn't know about this!
Would you recommend the shacl-validator use the CRM representation rather than the GVP ontology for LA validation purposes? If Getty is committed to continue supporting this format and it's being kept up-to-date with the other representations, I don't anticipate any downside to switching to this instead but figured I should ask.
Thanks!
@azaroth42, thanks for providing a more Linked Art friendly representation of the AAT terms, i.e.
https://data.getty.edu/vocab/aat/300404655
I didn't know about this!
Would you recommend the shacl-validator use the CRM representation rather than the GVP ontology for LA validation purposes? If Getty is committed to continue supporting this format and it's being kept up-to-date with the other representations, I don't anticipate any downside to switching to this instead but figured I should ask.
Thanks!