Upgrade to Claude Opus#553
Merged
Merged
Conversation
josephjclark
approved these changes
Jun 26, 2026
josephjclark
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 26, 2026
* Version stuff (#558) * add server version header to all responses * return version key on chat payloads * add version to langfuse * add has_code_attachment tag to langfuse * changesets * update template * add an error to echo service for debugging * ensure services respond to HEAD requests * revert langfuse tags * Upgrade to Claude Opus (#553) * switch to opus * adjust tokens effort * add changeset * adjust tokens * version: 1.5.0 --------- Co-authored-by: Hanna Paasivirta <hanna@openfn.org>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Short Description
Upgrade to Claude Opus in global_chat and job_chat.
Fixes #533
Implementation Details
This is a minimal model upgrade (as opposed to the earlier PR with new model selection options #528)
From running the acceptance tests once, I can see that Opus can be more concise; general judge results on job_chat test pass rate increases from 6/8 -> 8/9 while code quality pass rate stays at 3/9.
AI Usage
Please disclose how you've used AI in this work (it's cool, we just want to know!):
You can read more details in our Responsible AI Policy