Skip to content

Tesla: Authorization header leaks on cross-origin redirect via case-sensitive filtering

High severity GitHub Reviewed Published Jun 2, 2026 in elixir-tesla/tesla • Updated Jul 10, 2026

Package

erlang tesla (Erlang)

Affected versions

>= 0.6.0, < 1.18.3

Patched versions

1.18.3

Description

Summary

Tesla.Middleware.FollowRedirects is meant to strip the Authorization header when following a cross-origin redirect, but performs the check with a case-sensitive comparison against the lowercase string "authorization". Because Tesla preserves header keys exactly as supplied by the caller, any application that sets the header with its RFC 7235 canonical casing ("Authorization") bypasses the filter entirely, leaking bearer tokens or other credentials to whatever origin the redirect points at.

Details

The filter list in lib/tesla/middleware/follow_redirects.ex is defined as @filter_headers ["authorization", "host"] and the membership check k not in @filter_headers compares the raw key string without case normalization. HTTP header names are case-insensitive per RFC 7230, but Tesla stores them verbatim. A header tuple {"Authorization", "Bearer …"} does not match "authorization", so it passes through the filter and is forwarded to the redirect destination unchecked. The same defect applies to the "Host" entry.

An attacker who can control a Location: response seen by the victim client (their own endpoint, a redirect-open service, or a compromised upstream) receives the credential on the cross-origin follow. No special configuration is required beyond the victim using the standard header casing.

PoC

  1. Configure a Tesla client with Tesla.Middleware.FollowRedirects and set the Authorization header using canonical casing ({"Authorization", "Bearer <token>"}).
  2. Make a request to an endpoint that returns a 302 redirect to a different origin.
  3. Observe that the Authorization header with its value is present in the request delivered to the redirect destination.

Impact

High severity (CVSS v4.0: 8.2). Any application using tesla 1.4.0 through 1.18.2 with Tesla.Middleware.FollowRedirects and a non-lowercase Authorization header is affected. The workaround is to use all-lowercase "authorization" as the header key until upgrading to 1.18.3.

Workarounds

Normalize all header keys to lowercase before passing them to Tesla. Use "authorization" instead of "Authorization" when setting headers via Tesla.put_header/3 or Tesla.Middleware.Headers.

Resources

References

@yordis yordis published to elixir-tesla/tesla Jun 2, 2026
Published by the National Vulnerability Database Jun 2, 2026
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Jul 10, 2026
Reviewed Jul 10, 2026
Last updated Jul 10, 2026

Severity

High

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v4 base metrics

Exploitability Metrics
Attack Vector Network
Attack Complexity Low
Attack Requirements Present
Privileges Required None
User interaction None
Vulnerable System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality High
Integrity None
Availability None
Subsequent System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality None
Integrity None
Availability None

CVSS v4 base metrics

Exploitability Metrics
Attack Vector: This metric reflects the context by which vulnerability exploitation is possible. This metric value (and consequently the resulting severity) will be larger the more remote (logically, and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerable system. The assumption is that the number of potential attackers for a vulnerability that could be exploited from across a network is larger than the number of potential attackers that could exploit a vulnerability requiring physical access to a device, and therefore warrants a greater severity.
Attack Complexity: This metric captures measurable actions that must be taken by the attacker to actively evade or circumvent existing built-in security-enhancing conditions in order to obtain a working exploit. These are conditions whose primary purpose is to increase security and/or increase exploit engineering complexity. A vulnerability exploitable without a target-specific variable has a lower complexity than a vulnerability that would require non-trivial customization. This metric is meant to capture security mechanisms utilized by the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: This metric captures the prerequisite deployment and execution conditions or variables of the vulnerable system that enable the attack. These differ from security-enhancing techniques/technologies (ref Attack Complexity) as the primary purpose of these conditions is not to explicitly mitigate attacks, but rather, emerge naturally as a consequence of the deployment and execution of the vulnerable system.
Privileges Required: This metric describes the level of privileges an attacker must possess prior to successfully exploiting the vulnerability. The method by which the attacker obtains privileged credentials prior to the attack (e.g., free trial accounts), is outside the scope of this metric. Generally, self-service provisioned accounts do not constitute a privilege requirement if the attacker can grant themselves privileges as part of the attack.
User interaction: This metric captures the requirement for a human user, other than the attacker, to participate in the successful compromise of the vulnerable system. This metric determines whether the vulnerability can be exploited solely at the will of the attacker, or whether a separate user (or user-initiated process) must participate in some manner.
Vulnerable System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality: This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information managed by the VULNERABLE SYSTEM due to a successfully exploited vulnerability. Confidentiality refers to limiting information access and disclosure to only authorized users, as well as preventing access by, or disclosure to, unauthorized ones.
Integrity: This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information. Integrity of the VULNERABLE SYSTEM is impacted when an attacker makes unauthorized modification of system data. Integrity is also impacted when a system user can repudiate critical actions taken in the context of the system (e.g. due to insufficient logging).
Availability: This metric measures the impact to the availability of the VULNERABLE SYSTEM resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability. While the Confidentiality and Integrity impact metrics apply to the loss of confidentiality or integrity of data (e.g., information, files) used by the system, this metric refers to the loss of availability of the impacted system itself, such as a networked service (e.g., web, database, email). Since availability refers to the accessibility of information resources, attacks that consume network bandwidth, processor cycles, or disk space all impact the availability of a system.
Subsequent System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality: This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information managed by the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM due to a successfully exploited vulnerability. Confidentiality refers to limiting information access and disclosure to only authorized users, as well as preventing access by, or disclosure to, unauthorized ones.
Integrity: This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information. Integrity of the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM is impacted when an attacker makes unauthorized modification of system data. Integrity is also impacted when a system user can repudiate critical actions taken in the context of the system (e.g. due to insufficient logging).
Availability: This metric measures the impact to the availability of the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability. While the Confidentiality and Integrity impact metrics apply to the loss of confidentiality or integrity of data (e.g., information, files) used by the system, this metric refers to the loss of availability of the impacted system itself, such as a networked service (e.g., web, database, email). Since availability refers to the accessibility of information resources, attacks that consume network bandwidth, processor cycles, or disk space all impact the availability of a system.
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

EPSS score

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

This score estimates the probability of this vulnerability being exploited within the next 30 days. Data provided by FIRST.
(32nd percentile)

Weaknesses

Improper Handling of Case Sensitivity

The product does not properly account for differences in case sensitivity when accessing or determining the properties of a resource, leading to inconsistent results. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

CVE-2026-48595

GHSA ID

GHSA-9m9w-gxf7-rh8m

Source code

Credits

Dependabot alerts are not supported on some or all of the ecosystems on this advisory.

Learn more about GitHub language support

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.